<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WTB Tires: Weirwolf Gets an Overhaul for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feedthehabit.com/mountain-biking/wtb-tires-weirwolf-gets-an-overhaul-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feedthehabit.com/mountain-biking/wtb-tires-weirwolf-gets-an-overhaul-for-2010/</link>
	<description>Mountain Biking, Backcountry Skiing and Outdoor Gear Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.feedthehabit.com/mountain-biking/wtb-tires-weirwolf-gets-an-overhaul-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-8306</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedthehabit.com/?p=4223#comment-8306</guid>
		<description>Hey Ben

I totally hear ya&#039; on that one. Honestly, sizing is all over the place and most manufacturers rely on volume or uninflated measurements instead of measurements when they are inflated. I too have been surprised by the narrowness of some tires with claimed 2.35 or 2.4 sizes. But, once past the &quot;this seems narrow&quot; feel, they have consistently performed on the trail.  

I&#039;ve found myself to be content with 2.2 tires more often than I thought I would.  For the most part, I prefer around a 2.3-ish tire for all-mountain ripping, but have found tires slightly narrower and slightly wider that have performed well. 

Sometimes it takes a little faith and riding, which it seems, in the end, is what you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ben</p>
<p>I totally hear ya&#8217; on that one. Honestly, sizing is all over the place and most manufacturers rely on volume or uninflated measurements instead of measurements when they are inflated. I too have been surprised by the narrowness of some tires with claimed 2.35 or 2.4 sizes. But, once past the &#8220;this seems narrow&#8221; feel, they have consistently performed on the trail.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found myself to be content with 2.2 tires more often than I thought I would.  For the most part, I prefer around a 2.3-ish tire for all-mountain ripping, but have found tires slightly narrower and slightly wider that have performed well. </p>
<p>Sometimes it takes a little faith and riding, which it seems, in the end, is what you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.feedthehabit.com/mountain-biking/wtb-tires-weirwolf-gets-an-overhaul-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-8303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedthehabit.com/?p=4223#comment-8303</guid>
		<description>I ran a set of these on one of my bikes last season.  I was pretty disappointed, however, when I installed and inflated them, as they were claimed to be 2.55&quot; and they hardly measured 2.3&quot;.  After riding on them I was pretty satisfied with them after all, but before ordering another set, I would sure like to have a guarantee of what I&#039;m getting.  Has WTB addressed the claimed sizing issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran a set of these on one of my bikes last season.  I was pretty disappointed, however, when I installed and inflated them, as they were claimed to be 2.55&#8243; and they hardly measured 2.3&#8243;.  After riding on them I was pretty satisfied with them after all, but before ordering another set, I would sure like to have a guarantee of what I&#8217;m getting.  Has WTB addressed the claimed sizing issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.feedthehabit.com/mountain-biking/wtb-tires-weirwolf-gets-an-overhaul-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4018</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedthehabit.com/?p=4223#comment-4018</guid>
		<description>Yeah... a great tire for sure. I&#039;m told that Mark Weir spent countless hours dialing this in and that the technology behind the construction is truly unique. I&#039;m looking forward to giving it a whirl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230; a great tire for sure. I&#8217;m told that Mark Weir spent countless hours dialing this in and that the technology behind the construction is truly unique. I&#8217;m looking forward to giving it a whirl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.feedthehabit.com/mountain-biking/wtb-tires-weirwolf-gets-an-overhaul-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4017</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedthehabit.com/?p=4223#comment-4017</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great that they overhauled an already EPIC tire. I hope it makes it better... if that&#039;s possible?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great that they overhauled an already EPIC tire. I hope it makes it better&#8230; if that&#8217;s possible?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
