Scott has long been a household name in goggles and poles, but their other product lines–namely skis–have been, until recent years, schlepped overseas. I don’t know if the migration of Scott skis came after some Euros inadvertently left them here in the States and they multiplied like rabbits, or if it was a deliberate effort from Scott USA–I’ll leave that up to your imagination and good sense. Either way, their versatile ski line serves up top-shelf performance at still affordable price-points.
After realizing that my Atomic Beta Rides were a little too narrow overall, I went in search for an inbounds ski that would be versatile enough to tackle bulletproof hardpack as well as float through deep Utah pow and blast through the leftover crud. I wanted something that felt as good overall as my 2006 Head MoJo 90’s. I looked around and found the Scott Missions to be the perfect dimensions for a one-ski inbounds quiver.

About the Scott Mission 183
As mentioned above, Scott skis have only been in the USA since the 2005-2006 season, but have been sold in Europe for over 10 years. The guts of the 2008 Scott Mission’s remains the same for this year–with only a cosmetic change for this season. I dig the design–subdued and stylish. Too many skis these days are overdone pre-pubesent “artwork” and the Missions look cool and classy.
The construction of the Missions consists of a wood core with triaxial laminate sheets on top and bottom with a cap top. The build process is called SSC Cap or Sandwich Sidewall Cap Laminate. In addition, the Dual Radius sidecut is intended to make the skis more versatile–pressure them hard for short, quick turns or pressure them smoothly for large, sweeping turns.
To round out the construction, Scott uses their Pro Tip progressive tip height radius to help control tip deflection and keep the skis firmly planted to the snow.
Dimensions of the Scott Mission’s are as follows:
- 183cm – 130 / 90 / 116
- 178cm – 128 / 89 / 115
- 168cm – 126 / 86 / 113
Instead of forcing all lengths to be the same dimensions, the ski is optimized for both length and width to better suit lighter or shorter skiers. The Missions have received rave reviews from most of the industry press and heralded as great all-around performers.

Scott Mission 183 Ski Review
The Missions are my answer to the “one ski quiver.” I haven’t had the luxury of a 3-4 ski quiver for several years, so I look for a versatile ride that can handle all conditions. And, these days, I feel that a “one ski quiver” should have a 90mm waist at a minimum. Ski technology has evolved a lot in the past few years–90mm used to be only for dedicated powder skis just a few short years ago. Now, I’m telling you that it’s the minimum you’ll want for an all-around ski out here in the West–believe me!
My Missions are mounted with the bomber Rossignol Axial 2 140 ti Pro bindings in the bling bling gold color, which suits the brown and white Missions just fine and provides a solid 14 DIN.
There are no metal sheets in the Missions and the medium-stiffness flex is smooth and perfectly-suited for all-around riding in all conditions. The topsheets are ribbed with micro-grooves that remind me of those 3D stickers I had as a kid–you turn them one way and Superman is flying, then turn them the other way and Superman is saving Lois again. Sadly, the Missions don’t have a 3D graphic to them, just the ribs.
I rode the Missions at Sundance on a mixed bag day where the lower mountain was fairly firm groomers and the upper mountain had a mixture of untracked in the trees and mini-bumps with crud on the main trails. I did get a chance to drop one line into Bishop’s Bowl where I got 500 ft. of untracked, knee-deep windbuff–that’s when the hooting and hollering began in earnest.
Bombing down the groomers, I felt I could let the Mission’s loose and carve big arcs all day long. They track amazingly well and stay planted firmly on the snow even when plowing through rough, end-of-day groomers. Laying solid arcs and rolling from edge-to-edge was super easy and required little effort on my part. I felt I could just let them run and never once did they become unstable. Short, quick turns were just as easy with the proper pressure and angulation.
One thing I did notice is that these babies like to be on edge and they like to carve their turns. The occasional high-speed skidded turn–which is sometimes necessary to avoid obstacles or other skiers–was difficult to maintain because the skis wanted to hook up and arc instead of skid. While this is a good thing in most instances, there are times when skidded turns are inevitable and the sidecut was a little too hooky for that.
I also hit Snowbird on one of the deepest days of the year and put the Mission’s to the test in the deep pow. The Bird had yet to open Mineral Basin after a 30-inch, 3-day storm cycle and I was itching to hit it with the Missions. Off the tram, the Cirque was a mix of untracked and sloppy seconds. The Missions plowed through the sloppies and hopped through tight rocks with ease.
Heading back to the summit, I was a little late for the opening of Mineral Basin proper, but hit it just in time to bomb huge arcs through the leftover pow. I felt I could let them loose in the cut up pow just like I could on the groomers and the skis stayed stable and nimble.
The ultimate powder test was when I waited for the Bookends Traverse to open with waist-deep untracked lines from top-to-bottom. Dropping into my deepest turns of the year, I felt I could power the Missions and float just enough to maintain the proper speed. The 90mm width was great overall, but I think the Scott P4’s might have been an even better choice in these conditions. But, again, once back into the cut up crud and then to the groomers, the Missions showed their versatility.
Just a couple of comments… To add more float, Scott could do the Missions in a 186cm length instead of 183cm. And, the Missions are a pretty forgiving ski. They will kick you in the backseat if you’re not on top of them–don’t get me wrong. But, if you do get in the backseat, they are still maneuverable and easily allow you to get back on top of it without losing much control.
The Bottom Line on the Scott Mission 183’s
As a do-it-all ski, it’s hard to find any flaws with the Scott Mission 183’s. They arc a perfect turn on the groomers, plow through crud and float in the powder. There’s not much more you could ask for in a “one ski quiver” in my book. I dig the stylie graphics and the overall construction quality is superb. There will be days you’ll want something fatter like the Scott P4, but most days you’ll be stoked you’re bombing the groomers and charging the pow on the do-it-all Missions.
BUY NOW: Get a Pair of Scott Mission’s from Backcountry.com
![]()
NOTE: For your reference, I’m 5-feet 11-inches and weigh 180 lbs. I am a powder skier first and foremost and I love to bomb groomers. I spend as little time as possible in the terrain park and avoid moguls if at all possible. I grew up skiing Cascade Cement in Washington State, but have been converted to Utah’s mountains and snow and have three years of teaching experience at The Canyons Resort from 1997-2000.




Good review Jas. One question, full twin or just a little turned up tail? This would help determine actual running length on the 183, which is what I assume you purchased.
These are not full twins. However, the tail is slightly turned up as you can see in this profile shot:
I think that the Punisher is basically the same ski but with a twin tip.
http://scottusa.com/us_en/product/23/26/punisher
Thanks joshG… the Punisher is an all-new ski for this season. Looking at the dimensions and lengths, they are definitely similar, but not identical to the Missions.
Both powder and freeskier reference it as being the same ski. I too noticed that their website had slightly different dims but powder even described it as the same wood core, etc.
http://www.powdermag.com/buyersguide08/allmountain/scott-punisher/
I have always been happy with other scott products, I think the ski looks nice.
I just got another day on these skis and I love them more and more. They float really well and they carve like butta’. Seriously, these are some of the most fun overall skis I’ve ever owned… super-versatile and great fun overall.
Thanks for the review. I’m curious as to how the Missions compared to your Mojo 90s. Could you expand on that a bit? I see both the Mojo 90s and the Scott Punishers online for $250 — I wonder which you think would be the better choice. Thanks!
Yeah, the Punishers are a great price at $250. The Mojo 90’s are equally a steal at that price. Comparing the Missions and Mojo 90’s, they are both similar, but different-performing skis. The Missions are excellent for pow and crud, but have much more sidecut so they nearly turn on their own. Because of that, they don’t perform quite as well in powder as the Mojo’s. And, they aren’t a full twin. Comparing the Punishers to the Mojos, I’d guess the Punishers will carve the groomers better than the Mojos, but I can’t say for sure since I haven’t skied the Punishers (though some do say they are identical).
Both are great skis, no doubt. I loved my Mojos and the Missions are a bit more turny, thus making them a great inbounds ski. I hope that helps!
Here is the word from the wintersports marketing manager at Scott USA on the differences between the Punisher and Mission:
Thanks for taking the time to give your opinion on this ski. I am a ski patroller in British Columbia and just purchased a pair of Scott Missions for this coming season. I did a lot of research before making my final decision as I need a true all mountain ski under me when I get a call to help an injured skier. You never know where you’ll need to get to in a hurry. You sound like a well educated, informed individual and your review on these skis helped me out a great deal. Thanks again.
Thanks for your comments and I’m glad that you purchased these skis. They are awesome in all conditions.
But, I do want to make you aware that they are a bit “hooky” when doing an emergency snowplow at high-speeds. Sometimes that kind of situation presents itself, so I wanted you–especially–to be aware. Slow-speed snowplows are fine, but mid to higher-speed stuff, they are kind of herkey jerkey. You’ll find that with all moderately-shaped skis though, so it’s not a Mission-specific issue.
I didn’t really mention this in the reviews because I can safely assume that most people won’t really care about that, but with you being a patroller, you’ll need to snowplow as you are lowering a toboggan and I wanted you to be aware of that.
Get out there and enjoy carving on these skis!
Thanks for the heads up.
Just a note… the 2008/2009 Scott Mission ski is identical to the 2008 reviewed here except for new topsheets.
I noticed you said these are for shorter and lighter riders, but you are of average height and weight and liked them? I am 6′3″ 185, would these suit me?
For starters, where do you ski most? What type of skis do you typically ski?
I think if you’re used to skiing skis of this length, you’ll be just fine. I just rode them on Saturday at Snowbird and they were the perfect ski for mixed groomers and cut-up sloppy seconds. You’re only a tad heavier than I am, so you should be just fine.
I can’t outski these on groomers and if I get relaxed at all, they kick me in the butt if I get lazy. But, when pushed hard, they pop back with perfectly-arced turns.