It’s no secret that we favor skiing in Utah. Each year I have friends from Washington, Canada, Colorado, Jackson who all ask if I’m going to be making a trip to ski with them. It’s not that I don’t want to explore new areas and it’s not that I don’t want to ski with my buddies. Truth is every time I do want to ski somewhere else it means sacrificing easy access and generally better snow by leaving Utah.
That’s not to say that I haven’t scored the goods elsewhere. There was the time that Jason and I went to Silverton Mountain where is snowed feet and we got “stuck” in town thanks to the storm forcing the closure of Red Mountain Pass. Then there was the time I drove to Jackson with my buddy Gabe and it snowed 12″+ each of the two days we were there.
But no matter how many trips I’ve gotten lucky on there are a number that I wished I would have just stayed home and skied Utah pow. With 10 resorts within an hour and 15 of my house and more backcountry lines than I’ll ski in a lifetime it makes more sense to just stay put. And that’s just fine with me.
But what if you can’t find 2 major mountain ranges and 10 resorts within an hour drive of your home? What if you’re one of the millions for whom skiing means getting on a plane and heading west. Then what? As much as I want to keep all the powder in Utah to myself, I think this little video may help you decide.
Got a different destination that you favor over Utah or Colorado? Speak your mind and comment below.
A
foot of April flake just buried the 'Bird, the Crack House is warming
up and the Rollercoaster's drying out. Epic spring lines are calling
and you better be dialed. From 
agreed! Growing up in Seattle we had it good —- Alpental, Crystal Mountain, Stevens Pass, Mt. Baker…all within an hour or 3 from home. But if I’m going to live anywhere other than Seattle, I’m glad it’s Salt Lake. Even more accessible than Seattle’s resorts, the terrain is just as charged, and the snow is liiiiiight!! I mean, Snowbird and Alta are 25 mins from my driveway in town to the parking lot at the base of the lift. Now that’s accessible.
This video is so biased towards Utah, I don’t even know where to start. First of all, Vail should by no means be viewed as the poster child for Colorado. Another thing is that the snow can be just as deep elsewhere in the state as it is in the Wasatch. Case in point: on December 21, 2007 it snowed 60 inches in 48 hours at Monarch mountain in the Sawatch Range. Can you say epic?!? Also, with hundreds of thousands of mountains in totally different and unique mountain ranges, the possibilities are endless. Why ski only one mountain range with a limited amount of terrain? Backcountry skiers in Colorado can go entire seasons without seeing anyone else on the same slope, while those in Utah have only one option. I think I’ve made a reasonable point.
Skier25… thanks for your comments, and I agree with you on many levels. Pockets of great snow can be had anywhere in the Rockies. We all know how much freaking snow Silverton gets! That place flat out gets pounded.
However, the point is accessibility. If you are flying in from Boston, New York, Seattle, Los Angeles, etc., you will be skiing faster if you choose to go to SLC. DIA is a long haul from the slopes.
If you take the average snowfall at Snowbird, Alta, Solitude and Brighton and compare it to the average snowfall at the Colorado resorts, Utah wins that hands-down. Again, you do get pockets of crazy-deep snow anywhere in the Rockies–such as your observation at Monarch. The point is accessibility to the slopes, and Utah crushes Colorado in that regard.