Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    FeedTheHabit.com
    • Home
    • Gear Reviews
      • Road & Gravel
      • Mountain Biking
      • Bike Commuting
      • Trail Running
      • Skiing
      • Outdoors
      • Water Sports
      • Vehicles
    • News
    • Trip Reports
    • Videos
    FeedTheHabit.com
    Gear Reviews

    2011 Rocky Mountain Slayer 70 Review

    Jason MitchellBy Jason MitchellSeptember 10, 201019 Comments5 Mins Read

    Every time I ride a Rocky Mountain, I’m taken back to my first two full-suspension mountain bikes. Both were Rocky’s and both were excellent bikes with an uncanny ability to crush the downhill. After reviewing the Altitude 29er this Spring, I have now been able to ride the all-new 2011 Slayer 70 on my home turf. What do I think? The new Slayer remains true to the Rocky’s heritage and then some.

    Rocky Mountain Slayer 70 Features:

    • RMB FORM Hydroformed 7005 Aluminum frame
    • Fox 36 TALAS R fork (160mm/140mm)
    • 165mm rear travel via Fox RP23 XV custom-valved rear shock
    • Rocky Mountain SmoothLink suspension design
    • Straight Up geometry for improved climbing
    • 12 x 142mm rear thru-axle for stiffness
    • Easton Haven stem and carbon riser bars (test bike had aluminum bars)
    • Handbuilt wheelset with DT Swiss EX 500 rims, DT spokes and RM sealed hubs
    • SRAM X9 9-speed shifting
    • Formula the ONE brakeset with dual 180mm rotors
    • Race Face SixC crankset
    • MSRP: $4500

    2011 Rocky Mountain Slayer 70 Review

    Billed as a one-bike-quiver for the gravity-inclined, the all-new Slayer 70 takes an already-superb design to a new level. With a complete re-design, the new Slayer 70 is stiffer, stronger and more capable than the previous design. While it’s not the lightest 165mm bike on the market, its 31.5 lb fighting weight (with Crank Brothers Candy pedals) is still respectable and once on the trail, those extra few pounds go completely unnoticed.

    Lets talk about Rocky Mountain’s Straight Up geometry for a bit. It’s crazy to look at the frame and see the super-steep seat angle, but once you hop aboard, that tweaked geometry ends up paying off in spades. Steep and rocky climbs are no match for the Slayer as it is supremely-capable. I’ve been able to ascend up all my typical ascents in the middle-ring of the Slayer (just like my other bikes with less travel). I’m not noticing any significant difference in climbing ability and momentum — in spite of this being a much squishier bike than I typically ride. Yeah, the tires are big and heavy, but it really carries its girth well.

    More on its climbing ability. The Fox TALAS 36 adjusts from 160mm to 120mm with the flip of a switch. While this wasn’t necessarily needed, it was welcomed on really steep climbs as the front wheel stayed put. Honestly though, I think the TALAS should be custom-made at 160/130 or 140 for this bike. At 120, you don’t really want to ride it on anything but long climbs, but with a 140 or 130 setting, I think you could comfortably ride it on more XC-type trails while still getting improved climbing characteristics.

    I rode the Slayer on both XC terrain and grin-inducing downhill singletrack. In rolling terrain, the Slayer really remains nimble and fun. Yeah, it’s slower than thoroughbred XC machines, but it’s definitely not sluggish. When the terrain is tipped and the singletrack gets rough and fast, the Slayer is right at home. At the full 160mm of travel up front, I was able to really push this bike to the extreme and it just hooked up. Flying over jumps and railing berms, the Slayer shows its pedigree.

    It can really be described as a playful bike on the down. All that fun does become limited when the terrain gets tight and twisty as the slack front-end does slow things down. I wouldn’t call the handling sloppy at slow speeds, just delayed a bit. No worry though… at speed and on more open singletrack, the Slayer settles in and carves nicely.

    As mentioned, overall efficiency with the SmoothLink Suspension design is excellent with nothing but useful travel usage on both uphill climbs and downhill bombs. As advertised, pedal feedback and brake-jack are non-existent and the smoothness makes the suspension nary invisible so you can simply focus on having fun. I could see this bike at home for those with strong legs and big appetites for lift-serviced or leg-serviced technical descents. It can also easily be a one-bike-quiver for those who want a burly do-it-all steed.

    Good Slayer 70

    • Climbs extremely-well (Straight-up Geometry in the house)
    • The TALAS isn’t necessary, but helps glue the front wheel to the ground
    • Simply gobbles up the downhill in typical Rocky fashion
    • Very stiff laterally
    • 15QR rear axle helps it track even better
    • Full component spec leaves little to be desired
    • Can very well be a one bike quiver
    • Love the Easton Haven cockpit as opposed to house-brand stuff

    Bad Slayer 70

    • I’d like to see a 160/130 or 160/140 Fox TALAS… 120 is a bit much
    • A little floppy at slow speeds
    • Why no 10-speed?
    • Cable routing under the BB is a little awkward

    Bottom Line: 2011 Rocky Mountain Slayer 70

    With a great mix of new technology and predictable Rocky Mountain pedigree, the all-new Slayer 70 can be a quiver of one. I was able to climb with speed and efficiency that’s hard to come by in this class. And the downhill… oh yeah, it will make you smile.

    More Info: Visit Bikes.com to Learn More & Locate a Dealer

    rocky mountain bikes
    Jason Mitchell
    • Website
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn

    A native of the Pacific Northwest, Jason quickly developed a love for the outdoors and a thing for mountains. That infatuation continues as he founded this site in 1999 -- sharing his love of road biking, mountain biking, trail running and skiing. With extreme attention to detail, he has been a technical product manager for top 10 web properties, eCommerce businesses and SaaS companies for 20+ years. The combination of outdoor experience and technical savvy gives him a unique perspective that is channeled into every gear review. Utah's Wasatch Mountains are his playground. He rigorously tests every product and usually uses them beyond their intended purpose -- just for the sake of testing. (Note: Jason receives sample products in exchange for authentic reviews. He is not paid, nor influenced to share anything other than his honest opinions.)

    You Might Also Like

    Review: The Lace-up GIRO Stylus XC Shoe

    September 14, 2026

    Xero Mesa Summit Running Shoes Review

    September 10, 2026

    The North Face Summit Series Verto FA Boots Review

    September 8, 2026

    19 Comments

    1. Pingback: 2011 Rocky Mountain Slayer Unveiled - FeedTheHabit.com

    2. Pingback: Rocky Mountain Slayer SXC 70 Mountain Bike Review - FeedTheHabit.com

    3. Teledaddy207 on September 18, 2010 9:24 am

      Hi Jason,

      I have a magura thor fork, 140 1 1/8 that i am burning to build a bike around, are you still as hot over the ibis mojo as initially indicated or do you feel there is a better full carbon 26 frame out there. Thoughts?

      Thanks

      Teledaddy

      Reply
      • Jason Mitchell on September 18, 2010 10:18 am

        Indeed, the Mojo is still my favorite 26er bike on the market today.

        Reply
    4. Mike on September 20, 2010 11:32 am

      Hi Jason,

      What do you weigh ?

      Have you ridden the Altitude 26″ bikes ?

      “Could” you put a Cane Creek angled headset on this bike and sharpen up the floppy handling ?

      Reply
    5. Jason Mitchell on September 20, 2010 12:08 pm

      Hey Mike… I weigh 170 lbs. I have ridden the Altitude RSL 26:

      https://www.feedthehabit.com/mountain-biking/2009-rocky-mountain-altitude-rsl-90-quick-bike-review/

      Also, I suppose you could slap an AngleSet on there, to steepen up the Slayer’s handling. I don’t think it’s really necessary, but it’s something you definitely could play with.

      Reply
    6. Pingback: My Thoughts on BIKE Magazine’s Bible of Bike Tests - FeedTheHabit.com

    7. hank on February 2, 2011 5:23 pm

      wanker….

      and i’m happy to not have to become a member of this site to tell you that…
      the talas has three adjustment clicks…. doh, use only the top two. or?
      anyway, ride up, then ride down and enjoy. And flip the reverb on high!

      Reply
      • Jason Mitchell on February 2, 2011 6:42 pm

        Hank… thanks for your comment, but each manufacturer can spec their TALAS as they want (stock or custom). For this application, Rocky has specified their TALAS settings to be 160mm/120mm as I stated in the specs and in the review.

        You can read for yourself here:

        http://www.bikes.com/main+en+01_102+SLAYER_70.html?BIKE=947&CATID=1&SCATID=60&Y=2011

        Thanks for your input though. Just two clicks on this TALAS.

        Reply
        • Reed on March 21, 2011 5:44 pm

          I am building up a Slayer and am considering a Float instead of the TALAS. Do you think the TALAS is necessary? I used to ride an SXC Slayer and even though I hated the feeling with the fork lowered there were situations where I wheelied out if I didn’t. With the new straight up geometry I would like to think I can get by without lowering the front end. Thoughts?

          Reply
          • Jason Mitchell on March 23, 2011 8:52 pm

            Hey Reed… sorry for the delay. As I stated in the review, the travel adjust is a “nice to have” feature, but isn’t absolutely necessary unless you have long, extended or extremely-steep climbs. The Float should be just dandy with the geometry of the Slayer.

            Reply
    8. Buck on November 2, 2011 12:46 pm

      How do you think it compares to the 2008 slayer sxc 70 you tested in the past? I’m currently riding a 2007 sxc 70 that I love, and was thinking of getting a 2012 slayer.

      Reply
      • Jason Mitchell on November 2, 2011 10:05 pm

        The old Slayer vs. the new Slayer is an interesting comparison. Surprisingly, I think the new slayer climbs better and is definitely much more capable overall. Definitely not a cut on the old Slayer, but the new one with the Smoothlink suspension is really a killer machine. I had a great time on it last year and definitely think it would be a worthy upgrade.

        Reply
        • Pierre on January 20, 2012 9:36 am

          Hi Jason
          How does the slayer compare to a nomad ( gen 2) climbing and descending?
          Thanks for the awesome reviews.
          Pierre

          Reply
          • Jason Mitchell on January 20, 2012 10:20 am

            I haven’t ridden the new Nomad for comparison. The one I rode was the first-gen version and I know it has improved a ton since then. The new Slayer is quite an awesome bike that can handle serious abuse and id quite capable. it may be what you’re looking for if you can lighten it up just a hair.

            Reply
    9. Eduardo on January 31, 2012 4:21 pm

      Hi Jason, you’ve reviewed both, so if you had to get one do-it-all bike which would it be: RM Slayer or Mojo HD?, those are the ones I’m considering right now. Thank you for the help.

      Reply
      • Jason Mitchell on January 31, 2012 4:23 pm

        I’d have to go with the HD. It’s carbon and you can de-tune it to 140mm, if you ever wanted to.

        Reply
        • Eduardo on February 3, 2012 12:32 pm

          Well I’m getting an amazing deal on a Slayer 70! what would you say are the main advantages/disadvantages between the two?. Right now I have a Classic Mojo that I love and bought in part because of your recommendation. I’d keep both bikes, it’s not a substitute for the Mojo, at least for a while.
          Thanks again Jason.

          Reply
          • Jason Mitchell on February 3, 2012 3:42 pm

            The Slayer70 is awesome overall. The main disadvantages are weight-related and versatility. Since you have a standard Mojo, then having the Slayer in the quiver would be sweet.

            Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You Might Like
    7.6

    Drift ARC Mountain Bike Shoes Review

    July 31, 2026
    8.8

    Tifosi Moab XC Sunglasses Review

    June 5, 2026
    9.4

    Classic Style: Smith Optics Truss Sunglass Review

    May 28, 2026
    9.3

    Review: 2026 Pinarello Grevil F7 — Cool Italian Gravel Machine

    April 13, 2026
    9.0

    Küat Piston Ion Hitch Rack Review

    April 8, 2026
    9.4

    Ari Explorer Peak Comp e-Fat Bike Review

    March 9, 2026
    9.4

    Lezyne Mega Drive 2400+ Bike Light Review

    December 8, 2025
    8.8

    Review: Outdoor Research Freewheel MTB 4-Finger Gloves

    November 13, 2025
    9.5

    Velocio UltraPack Pants Review

    November 7, 2025
    9.2

    Arc’teryx Norvan Jacket Review – 2025 Update

    October 30, 2025
    Advertisement
    Our Latest Posts
    • Review: The Lace-up GIRO Stylus XC Shoe
    • Xero Mesa Summit Running Shoes Review
    • The North Face Summit Series Verto FA Boots Review
    • Pinarello Launches All-new 2027 X-Series Endurance Lineup
    • Mammut Aenergy Trail Vest 12 Review
    • La Sportiva Prodigio Pro Review – Italian Comfort
    • HOKA Infini Hike TC Sandals Review
    • Suunto Spark Open-ear Sport Earbuds Review
    • Review: COROS PACE 4 is a Lightweight Training Powerhouse
    • Review: Mammut Aenergy Trail All Mountain Trail Running Shoes
    About Us
    About Us

    Since 1999, we have delivered in-depth outdoor gear reviews, articles and content. We feature a small staff of savvy, experienced writers who love to use and review outdoor gear.

    Throughout the site and on reviews, we provide affiliate links to Amazon, REI, Backcountry and other retailers so we can get a small commission on purchases.

    To contact us or learn more, go to our About Us page.

    © FeedTheHabit.com 1999 - 2026 | All rights reserved | Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.